1. The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as referred to in paragraph (2);

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Attached Form among the buildings listed in the Attached List;

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The fact that on January 31, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) provided that the Defendant engaged in repair business of computers and peripheral devices, etc.; (b) provided that, among the commercial buildings listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff, 50,000 square meters in a ship connected each point of (a) KRW 50,00,000; (c) the monthly rent of KRW 2,20,000 (payment on January 1, 200; (d) the lease period of KRW 2,00,00,000 (hereinafter “the lease object of this case”); and (e) provided that the Plaintiff did not provide the Defendant with a certificate of delayed payment of KRW 50,00,000 from February 1, 2009 to January 31, 2014; or (e) provided the Defendant with a total of KRW 50,000,000 from the Defendant’s date of conclusion of the lease agreement of this case; and (e) provided the Defendant with the Defendant on July 15, 2015, 2015.

B. According to the fact that the termination of the lease agreement was recognized, since the Defendant, who is the lessee of the commercial building, expressed his/her intent to terminate the lease agreement to the Defendant pursuant to Article 10-8 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, more than three times the delayed amount of rent by the Plaintiff, the lessee of the commercial building, and accordingly, the instant lease agreement was terminated on July 16, 2015, which

C. Since the instant lease contract was terminated as above, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the leased object to the Plaintiff.

The obligation to pay the overdue rent is the same.