logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고합115
공정증서원본불실기재등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as the grandchildren of F on January 21, 2009, for the above F, who was declared incompetent by the Seoul Family Court on June 18, 2009, was a legal guardian on June 18, 2009, and Defendant B was the seat of the above A.

Defendant

A, as a legal guardian of the above F, was able to exercise the right to manage the property owned by the F. In order to pretend that the Defendant B and F were liable for the debt of KRW 500 million to Defendant B, F issued false promissory notes in the F’s name, and conspired to collect KRW 500 million stored in a specified money trust (Korean bank G), in a way that F is subject to a notarized order and issued in full.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On August 9, 2012, the Defendants falsely entered in the authentic copy of a notarial deed at the law firm I’s office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, Defendant A entered “B”, “50,000,000,” “200,000,” “in the face of the face of the face of a promissory note using a verification-type pen,” “in sight payment”, “in the face of the due date,” “in the face of the issue date”, “in August 9, 2012,” and “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu J 102, 503, F, and place of issuance”, and affixed a false promissory note with the name of the issuer’s name attached thereto, attached the F’s personal information in the face of the request for notarial services, attached his/her agent personal information in the face of the request for notarial services, and attached his/her signature and seal thereon.

The Defendants continued to prepare a notarial deed with respect to a promissory note prepared as above, showing the documents, such as the said promissory note, to K in charge of the authentication of the authentication of the authentication of the law.

As a result, the Defendants made a false report to K, who is the attorney-at-law in charge of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, and made it false to the executory original notarial deed.

arrow