logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.12.09 2016고정973
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on behalf of the father of E, who is a joint operator of the convenience store “D” in the victim B, worked as a part-time employee (12:00-13:00) from June 13, 2014 to June 30, 2016 on behalf of the victim B, while selling goods and inventory management.

1. On July 27, 2015, the Defendant, around July 27, 2015, embezzled, on July 27, 2015, sold tobacco 2:12:26, at the above convenience store, sold tobacco 2:50,00 from the imprisoned customers, and put 50,000 won labs into the convenience store, put them into one’s wall, and kept in his/her business for the victim. At that time, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property by consuming the victim’s property for personal use in an irregular place.

2. On July 27, 2015, the Defendant embezzled, around 13:00 on July 27, 2015, up to 13:00 on July 27, 2015, up to KRW 115,00 in cash at a time gold bank kept under custody of the calculation unit at the above convenience store, put the victim into his/her own wall and kept for his/her business purposes. At that time, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property by consuming the victim’s personal property for the victim’s personal use at an insular place.

3. On August 5, 2015, at around 13:00 on August 5, 2015, the Defendant, at the convenience store around 13:00 on August 5, 2015, sold two brumat cremation paper to the influoring customer without entering them into the singular book, and then filled up KRW 1,600 to the 1,600 to the fluoring customer, in which the Defendant was in custody for the victim, he embezzled the victim’s property by consuming the victim’s property for personal use in an influent place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning B and E;

1. A investigative report and a photograph of the CCTV to cut off attached CCTV;

1. A copy of the same business agreement [this is recognized by the fact that paragraphs 1 and 3 of the same Article were appropriated without verifying the fact that there was no person other than the defendant, and there was no person other than the defendant, before checking the shortage of 115,000 won of the Si / Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun

arrow