logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.09.24 2020노199
사기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, the Defendant appealed from the Defendant on the ground that it is deemed unfair. However, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and pleadings of the instant case including the fact that the Defendant, from around December 31, 2013 to February 25, 2019, a total of KRW 228,980,000, which was obtained from the victim, is very heavy in view of the period of crime, method of crime, amount of deception, the relationship between the victim and the Defendant, etc., and that the liability for the crime is very heavy, and that the damage has not been recovered up to the present time, in addition to the repayment by the victim of some amount before filing a complaint, the Defendant all of the instant crime is recognized, and even considering the fact that the execution of the sentence was completed, it does not necessarily mean that the Defendant’s punishment imposed on the grounds as stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

In the trial, the prosecutor applied for changes in indictment to the effect that the prosecutor corrects part of the facts charged, and this court permitted it.

However, this is merely a correction of the sum due to calculation error and it cannot be deemed that there was a change in the facts charged to the extent that it affects the defendant's defense right. Thus, the judgment of the court below is not reversed on the ground of changes in the indictment, and "17,907,902 won" is corrected as "228,980,000 won" in the aggregate amount of 2nd, 5th, and 17th and 17th, and the

On the other hand, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the term “Dong” in the column No. 4 and each column of the column No. 21 in the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant DJ, No. 22, the term “Da E” in the name of the defendant in the name of the defendant, the term “Dong” in the column No. 45, the term “K L in the name of the defendant” in the column No. 58, and the term “the date and time” in the column No. 58.

arrow