logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.08 2018누55793
출국금지기간연장처분 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim that the court changed in exchange is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following cases.

(1) In addition, the grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in this court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from that alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are fully examined, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court is justifiable). [The part that was completely used] The second-class 8 or 9 of the first instance court rendered a disposition “(the instant disposition (the instant disposition)” (the instant disposition was extended on May 11, 2018), and the disposition was again taken to extend the period of prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff from November 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea as of October 22, 2018”).

"Nos. 1 and 25 of A" in Chapter 10 of the second judgment of the first instance shall be written with evidence "Nos. 1, 25, and 34 of A.

The term "10" in the table No. 11 in the table No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "1," and the term "11" in the table No. 13 shall be read as "10," respectively.

The content of “(b)(7) of the first instance judgment shall be as follows.” The entry and departure details from January 1, 2008 to August 26, 2018 by the Plaintiff’s spouse are as follows.

On February 14, 2008, 1208.2.2.2.2.2.2.2. 4.2.2. 13.2.2. 4.2. 2008.2.2. 15.33.2. 4.2.2. 4.2014.2.3.2.3.2.2.2.33.2.20 of the first instance court of Japan’s first instance stated “18 through 20” as “18 through 20, 30, 31.”

No. 10 of the first instance judgment, "No. 24" of the first instance judgment shall be added to "No. 24,27".

The 11th judgment of the first instance court "18 days" in the 15th judgment shall be applied to "117 days".

The 12th judgment of the first instance court is â………§ 10, 11.

arrow