The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable statement such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of and reflects against the crime late when the defendant was in the trial, that the statement made by the defendant F by the teacher of the defendant did not affect the trial result of the case, such as a special injury to the defendant, that there was no record of punishment, that there was no record of punishment for the same crime, that there is a concurrent crime relation with the crime such as violation of the Narcotics Control Act (e.g., violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., which became final and conclusive, and that the judgment should be taken into account at the same time in the concurrent relationship with the crime after Article 37 of the Criminal Act. However, perjury causes confusion and incompetence in the state's judicial action, which requires strict punishment. The statement of perjury made by the defendant by the defendant was an important statement about the important fact at the judgment of not guilty of the case, such as special injury to the defendant, and that it led to the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and that there is no reason for the defendant's punishment too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.