1. Of each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff:

A. As to each share of 6/22 by Defendant A and C:

B. Defendant B, and .

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 4, 1967, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the deceased H to purchase each of the instant land at KRW 20,958 to use each of the instant land as a G road acquisition site, and paid the purchase price around that time.

B. The Defendants jointly inherited the network H’s property, including each of the instant land, as they died with Defendant A and I, who is the wife of March 13, 1979, Defendant C(the Family), Defendant B(the marriage), D(the marriage), E(the marriage), and F(the marriage).

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant C: The remaining Defendants of confessions: The absence of dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to Article 1009 of the former Civil Act (amended by Act No. 4199, Jan. 13, 1990), the Defendants’ statutory inheritance portion as of March 13, 1979, when the deceased H, is Defendant A6/22, Defendant C6/22, Defendant C6/22, Defendant C, Australia’s heir, Defendant B, Defendant E, and Defendant E and F, respectively, who are unmarried daughters.

B. According to the above facts, the Defendants, the deceased H’s inheritors, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer for each of the above shares out of each of the instant land to the Plaintiff on October 4, 1967.

3. If so, the plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.