A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 8. 5. 01:10경 서울 강서구 B에 있는 C약국 앞 도로에서, 택시기사인 D과 요금문제로 시비하던 중, 위 택시기사의 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 정복을 착용한 경찰관인 서울강서경찰서 E지구대 소속 경위 F, 경장 G가 귀가를 권유하자, 술에 취하여 갑자기 ‘내가 뭘 잘못했는데 경찰관이 왔느냐’고 하면서 위 F의 손목을 잡아채어 그 손목에 차고 있던 시계를 바닥에 떨어뜨리고, 현장을 떠나려는 위 경찰관들 탑승의 순찰차를 가로막고, 이를 제지하는 경장 G의 가슴을 손으로 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each police statement of H and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes under relevant Articles of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution) has no basic area (Article 6-1 and 4 months) (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties) (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Duties) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Prevention of Violations of Official Duties) (Article 62(1) of the

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.