The Defendant, as the Plaintiff

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the annex 2 list;

B. From November 12, 2015, the above real estate.

In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the facts identical to the entry of the cause of claim No. 1 can be acknowledged.

According to these facts of recognition, the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was terminated.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list 2, and to pay the amount of money by the ratio of KRW 350,000 per month from November 12, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the above real estate with overdue rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.