logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.05.16 2017고단175
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the stage of “C” located in Switzerland-si B around 01:35 on January 25, 2017; and (b) at the stage of “C”, the Defendant was at the victim D (in this case, 29 years of age) who had danced, with the victim’s own hand, was humpted.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. If a conviction on a sex offense subject to registration of personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

In comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, motive, progress, seriousness of a crime, the degree and expected side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to an order of disclosure or notification, the preventive effect of a sexual crime subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, the effect of the protection of the victim, etc. of the Defendant exempted from the disclosure or notification order, there are special circumstances under which the disclosure of personal information may not be disclosed pursuant to Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

Since it is judged, it is not ordered to disclose or notify the defendant.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant's crime is not less severe, and that there is no agreement with the victim, etc., which is disadvantageous to the defendant, and the defendant is repenting while making a confession of the crime in this case, and there is no same record.

arrow