logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.04.03 2014고정173
마약류관리에관한법률위반(마약)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a hotel, is not a narcotics handler.

The defendant from April 20, 2014 to the same year.

5. From the 17:00 on June 16, 17:00, the Defendant: (a) maintained 64 poppy, which is an plant used as a raw material for narcotics, that had been born in approximately 9.9 square meters in front of “D” gardening (three square meters); and (b) cultivated 64 moppy (marif).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statements of the defendant in the second protocol of trial;

1. Protocol of examination of a witness E;

1. Protocol of inspection by this Court;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene, photographs and expert records of seized articles;

1. Article 61(1)2 and Article 3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (Selection of Fines) for the crime at issue of the pertinent Act on the Control of Narcotics (hereinafter “the Act”). However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, the Defendant may recognize the fact that, even if the Defendant was not directly influences, the Defendant discovered and managed the quantity of the quantity of the quantity of the quantity that the above quantity of the quantity of the quantity was not opened and the quantity of the quantity of the quantity of the fluents in the Defendant’s operation, which can be deemed to be within the control area of the Defendant, (i) the above flusium was a person in front of the Defendant’s operation, which can be deemed to be within the control area of the Defendant, and (ii) the Defendant was already recommended by the police officer to remove the quantity of the quantity of the flusium in the garden, and (iii) even if the Defendant was already urged

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow