1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 7, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant and paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 25,000,000 to the Defendant on January 11, 2006, in order to carry out a collective housing development project (hereinafter “instant project”) on the land in Gangseo-si B (hereinafter “instant land”).

o Sales Price: KRW 250,000,000: 25,000 for down payment: 25,000,000 for down payment: Preparation of a written contract with the landowner.

Date. Balance 225,00,000 won until December 31, 2006

o The defendant shall, after entering into a contract, submit two copies, etc. of a certificate of the personal seal impression (use only for authorization and permission) for land use for the purpose of giving consent to land use necessary for the business so that the plaintiff can promote the authorization and permission business for

When the plaintiff requests an additional submission, the defendant shall submit it immediately.

(The Defendant’s obligation under Article 4 of the sales contract and the proviso (hereinafter referred to as “instant obligation to cooperate”)

B. The progress of the instant business and notification1 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant) The Plaintiff issued two new copies of the certificate of personal seal impression necessary for the authorization and permission on July 9, 2007 and September 10, 2007, and notified the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant notification”).

However, the Defendant did not issue a certificate of personal seal impression on the ground that the Plaintiff could not trust the Plaintiff, such as applying for approval of the business after a considerable period of time from the date of concluding the instant sales contract. (2) The Plaintiff applied for approval of the instant project to Gangnam-si around August 7, 2007, but rejected the said application on the ground that there was insufficient relevant documents, such as the written consent to land use, etc.

C. The Plaintiff’s cancellation of the Plaintiff’s registration of a housing construction business operator was notified of the procedures for the hearing on the cancellation of the registration of the housing construction business operator in 2009, but did not comply with the procedures for the hearing. The Plaintiff’s registration of the housing construction business operator on September 11, 2009, on the ground that it failed to meet