1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasons why this Court should explain concerning this part of the basic facts are as follows: (a) it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to changing “50 days” into “50 days” under the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) therefore, (c) it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

2. With respect to the existence and scope of liability for damages, this Court shall provide 2,852,43 won [2,80 won [2,50 won per 4,593,495 won per 4,231,315 won per 15 won for repairs appraised by an appraiser] [2,852,43 won per 4,231,315 won per 4,278,872 won per 20 won per 2,50 won per 360 won per 2,570 won per 360 won per 2,570 won per 360 won per 2,50 won per 4,520 won per 1,253,520 won per 105,350 won per 321,970 won per 200 won per 1,60 won per 350 won per 1,5395 won per 39,5395];

C. Negligence offset: Provided, however, in full view of the above evidence and evidence No. 1 evidence, the defendant, at the time of the accident of this case, shocked the damaged vehicle of this case running along the vehicle at the right side to enter the entrance of the Kanyang Agricultural and Marine Products Market in front of the Southern Metropolitan City Intersection in order to enter the entrance of the Gansan Agricultural and Marine Products Market, and the location at the time of the accident was within the intersection without a lane marking.