beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won;
2. In a case where Defendant A does not pay the above fine, 60,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts (Co-operation of Defendant A on February 19, 2010) Defendant A is the relationship between G, E and Gyeongnam Yangsan Pewn Pewn Pewn Pewn Pewn Pewn.
Defendant
A around 01:00 on February 19, 2010, a victim I was provided with alcoholic beverages, food, etc. equivalent to KRW 1,350,00,00 in total, including three jun-ju, two jun-ju, two jun-ju, five jun-ju, five jun-ju service charges, three jun-man service charges, etc.
E has left a place before the drinking place so far, while the Defendant and G drinking alcohol at the last time. After the drinking place, the victim presented an invoice after the drinking place, and claimed the drinking value, G acted as “the victim”, “I want to see what is, what is, what is, what is, what is, what is, how much, what is what is,” and “I want to die,” and “I see what is, what is, what is,” while placing a 1 million foot tag on the floor,” and Defendant A has off a string, which shows the text of the excessive language that is inscribed on the upper part of the arms and the chest, and in the event of a further claim for the drinking value, such as “I am equal to bit bit bitch bitch bitch,” the victim’s life, body, etc.
As a result, Defendant A, in collaboration with G, had the victim frighten and frighten 350,000 won frighten frighten frighten frighten frighten frighten frighten frighten.
(In the facts of prosecution, the Defendant’s oral value stated as KRW 1.4 million, and the amount being rewritten is 1.4 million, and 4 million, excluding the 1.4 million won check, and 1.4 million won check is somewhat unclear. However, when I’s statement (3.13 pages of investigation records) among the two interrogation protocols of the prosecution in relation to G, the drinking value on the same day was 1.35 million won, and the amount not received by the victim was clearly stated as KRW 3.5 million, and thus, the facts charged are examined as identical to the above facts charged). The summary of evidence is as follows.
1. Legal statement of a witness I;
2. Application of the law on partial statement of Defendant A and Witness G
1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;