logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.03.19 2015고정6
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of Seoul Branch of Construction Business Group B, and B Co., Ltd. entered into a contract for multi-household construction with Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) around April 2013.

In order to report the commencement of construction works under the name of another construction company, the defendant, who introduced the above construction works without delay due to the circumstances of the company B, was urged to report the commencement of construction works and report the commencement of construction works under the name of another construction company.

1. On May 10, 2013, the Defendant forged a copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of the construction project in the form of the standard construction contract in the name of the private construction works contract in the name of the corporation incorporated in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Dobongland 403), Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu D, the contract amount column in the construction site column, the contract amount column in the contractor column, the contractor column, the contractor column, the contractor column, “C” and the contractor column, attached the seal of the name C arbitrarily created by C, and forged a copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of C on rights and duties.

2. On May 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around the 2013, at a sampling comprehensive architectural firm, he/she stored a forged standard contract form through employees in the above office; (b) connected the third party’s website (www.eais.go.K) and submitted the image file to the public official in charge of the Gwangjin-gu office who is aware of the forgery as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint (including attached documents);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.

arrow