The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Influence gas gas for seized yellow, fluor(s).

An ex officio judgment prosecutor shall be conducted with the name of the crime against the defendant during the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the court of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the court of the trial of the trial of the trial of the trial of the court of the trial of the trial of the defendant, and the applicable legal provision of Article 174 and 164 (1)

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment below is reversed and it is again decided as follows without examining the defendant's improper assertion of sentencing, on the ground that there is an ex officio reversal.

Criminal facts

The summary of the judgment of the court below is as follows, except for the following changes to the facts constituting the crime:

On October 29, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on August 29, 2015, and the probation period becomes final and conclusive on November 6, 2015.

On November 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in the ward of the Seo-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, where he leased and used as a multi-family housing; (b) the Defendant’s wife, who was dissatisfied with the suspicion that the Defendant’s wife would have a telephone call with other males, was not coming out of the dwelling space; (c) the Defendant’s wife, who was in possession of a bubbbbbb with a bubbb, was on board with a bubbbb, which was on the part of the bubb, and the Defendant had a bubbbb, but was on the part of the bub, which was on the part of the said dwelling.

Accordingly, the defendant caused public danger by setting fire to his own market fire and invasion.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 167 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 167 (2) and (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation.