Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2016, at around 05:05, the Defendant filed 112 declarations to the effect that “the Defendant frighted a disturbance, such as drinking female frighting to fright, and frighting to fright,” (Case No. 733) and sent to the police box of the Daegu Southern Police Station C, which was called out, demanded the Defendant to carry out the above item for self-defense of the disturbance from D and the police box of the Daegu Southern Police Station C, which was called out. On the other hand, D et al. to carry out the said item for self-harm using the Doluco knife, and she again brought it out from D et al., and then al., she frighted D’s chest to fright to frighte and fright to frighte the e-mail, and frighted its part when she frighted into his arms, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reporting duties and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Each public official certificate;

1. Service log of a police box;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are considered to be against the Defendant’s depth, and the primary offender, etc. shall be selected by a fine, taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances leading to the Defendant’s crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions as indicated in the trial process of the instant case shall be determined as ordered.