1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

Seized evidence Nos. 2 through 13, 15, 25 from Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act is the owner of the game in the open game room in the sea, Defendant D is the customer invitation books in the game room in the above game room, Defendant B, C, and E are employees who guide the game method and exchange in the above game room, and Defendant F is the transportation of customers in the above game room.

No person shall provide game products not classified for distribution or use, or exchange or arrange for exchange or exchange or repurchase the results of tangible or intangible obtained through the use of the game products for business purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired in collusion, from October 8, 2013 to October 10, 2013, in the game room without a trade name in Pyeongtaek-si H, the Defendants installed 56 game apparatus at sea, which is a game product not rated by the Game Rating Board, and let customers play the game once using the said game machine, and exchanged 4,500 won, which is the remainder of the amount obtained by deducting 10% of the commission for 10% from the points obtained by the customers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange tangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes, and provided ungrade game products for use.

2. Defendant A, at around 01:00 on October 10, 2013, was arrested as a flagrant offender at the sea-going game site located in Pyeongtaek-si H, and at around 03:30 on the same day, was caught by suspicion of violating the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry, and was arrested. Defendant A, who was waiting for a police officer, appealed through the main box of the above police box, by asserting that he was carried in to the International Police Station of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station at around 03:30 on the same day, who was waiting for the seat and carried in, and carried in, the air. Defendant A escaped through the main box of the above police box, using the gap in which surveillance was neglected after leaving the main box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Written Statement;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. The application of each on-site photograph statute.