The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the arguments in this case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering the various reasons for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to ex post facto change the sentencing.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is clear that the “nick drive” of the 16th page 16 of the judgment of the court below is erroneous and erroneously held office, the Defendant’s appeal is ex officio correction in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.