1. The Defendant’s KRW 148,394,40 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 12, 2010 to January 14, 2016.

The contents of the public works project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): The project operator: Defendant 3) the determination of the road zone (change) and the public notice: on June 17, 2009, the Ulsan-gu Special Metropolitan City Land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”) published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and 14,936 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”).

The instant land was divided into the parts incorporated into the instant project among the E-based land of 67,934 square meters prior to the division (hereinafter “instant land before the division”), and thereby, the area of E forest was reduced to 52,98 square meters.

The Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter “instant remaining land”) rendered a ruling of expropriation on March 18, 2010 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”) by March 18, 2010 by the Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”).

(1) 1) Compensation commencement date: Compensation for the instant land: (a) on May 11, 2010: (b) the Plaintiff asserted that the instant land was compensated for the loss incurred due to the decline in the value of the remaining land of KRW 288,264,800; and (c) the Plaintiff claimed the Defendant to compensate for the damages arising from the decline in the value of the remaining land of this case as the instant project, but no agreement was reached; (d) on March 26, 2015, the Central Land Expropriation Committee filed a petition for the adjudication on compensation for losses with the Central Land Expropriation Committee; (e) the Plaintiff was dismissed on March 26, 2015. [Grounds for recognition] without any dispute; (e) the entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the number of branches); and (e) the Plaintiff’s assertion that the purport of the entire pleadings was to be determined by dividing only the instant land owned by the Plaintiff’s central part of the land before the instant land division; (e) the Defendant paid compensation for the Plaintiff’s compensation for the remaining land of this case and its surrounding land.