1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real property listed in the separate sheet, each point is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

1. On April 11, 2018, the Plaintiff leased the portion (A) part (a) of the instant real estate connected in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the real estate indicated in the separate sheet among the real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to C with a rental deposit of KRW 5 million, the rental deposit of KRW 5 million, and the monthly rent of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff seeking the exclusion of disturbance based on ownership.

(1) The court below's decision is just because of the fact that the plaintiff was in prison. However, while the lessor and the sub-lessee did not pay the rent for a long time, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit, and unless the plaintiff consented to the defendant's request, the plaintiff shall not be neglected to cause additional damage.) Meanwhile, the defendant is obligated to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent for the use of the above real estate to the plaintiff. Since it is reasonable to deem the amount as KRW 500,000,000, which is the amount equivalent to the rent under the lease agreement entered into between the plaintiff and C, the defendant is obligated to jointly pay the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 500,000 per month from November 30, 2018 to the completion date of delivery of the above real estate.

2. Conclusion, the claim of this case shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.