logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.01.16 2015가합39326
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 111,581,979 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from October 29, 2014 to January 16, 2019.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff, along with two Chinese nationals, was on a taxi driven by Defendant B, and was inflicted an assault on Defendant B, and the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is the employer of Defendant B, who is a company that carries on the international TAX passenger car transport business for foreigners.

On October 29, 2014, at around 23:30, 2014, three persons, including the Plaintiff’s assault against the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s bodily injury, and the Plaintiff’s two Chinese residents, were on the street in front of the E hotel located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, Defendant B demanded that “this cab be on a foreigner-only taxi and Korean people cannot live,” and that the Plaintiff be forced to leave the cab, and that “the two cab is a Chinese person, who is a Chinese person, shall be reported on the refusal of boarding.”

Defendant B heard the horses from the Plaintiff that “I would report,” and expressed the Plaintiff’s desire to do so, and she left the taxi to the head of the taxi seated by the Plaintiff, left the Plaintiff’s arms that the Plaintiff was seated at the string, left the taxi, left the taxi, and sustained injury of the injury of the injury of the injury caused by an external pathic disease (draft) for about four weeks in need of medical treatment of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). Defendant B’s criminal punishment on June 24, 2015 was prosecuted for the instant accident as a summary order on July 8, 2015 (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015Da12655), and subsequently requested a formal trial, but it became final and conclusive upon conviction on September 10, 2015 (not guilty of the injury).

(Seoul Central District Court 2015 High Court 2897). [Reasons for Recognition] did not dispute, entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6 through 12, 36, 37 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the Director of the F Hospital of this Court, the purport of the entire pleadings.

arrow