1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff is a shareholder of shares listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From 1979 to 1979, the Plaintiff served as a director or representative director of D (hereinafter “D”) and agreed with the Defendants to name trust D shares to be acquired from E, F, and G with the Defendants. However, the Plaintiff fully bears the acquisition price of shares; however, the Defendants, as the transferee of shares, concluded a contract with E and 2, for the convenience of the stock acquisition and title trust agreement.

B. Accordingly, on December 18, 1998, Defendant B entered into a contract with E to purchase 4,695 shares of E holding, to purchase 6,918 shares of F holding D holding with F on December 23, 199, and Defendant C entered into a contract with G to purchase 5,601 shares of G holding between G on August 21, 2001, and the Defendants hold shares listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant shares”).

C. On September 23, 2016, the Plaintiff expressed to the Defendants the intent to terminate the title trust agreement, and requested the Defendants to cooperate in the transfer of title to the instant shares owned by the Defendants. The Defendants did not cooperate therein.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleading

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the plaintiff is deemed to have held the title trust of the shares acquired by the defendants against the defendants. Since the plaintiff terminated the above title trust agreement, the defendants did not cooperate with the change of entry into the ownership of the shares of this case, there is a benefit to seek confirmation as to the status of shareholders of the shares of this case

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.