The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although each of the crimes of this case is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant is against the judgment and that some damage has been repaid, each of the crimes of this case is committed by deceiving loans under the name of the former loan by pretending to lease the lending of eight households owned by the defendant in collusion with the lending broker, and the quality of the crime is not only poor, but also poor, the degree of the defendant's participation in each of the above crimes is not less than less than 200 million won, and the total amount of the defrauded is not more than 200 million won, and the damage recovery is not adequately performed, and other circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing indicated in the records, such as the character, behavior, age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed for lack of grounds.

(However, in the judgment of the court below, the term "documents 10,000,000 won" in 3, 19, 28,000 won in 3, 28,000 won in 3,00 won in 19, and 8, 6, 6, 1, and 3 are each errors of "I," and such errors are clearly stated in 1, 3,000 won in 8,000 won in 1,000,000 won in 28,000 won in 1,000,000 won in 1,000