The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The fact that the Defendant’s judgment on the grounds for appeal (e.g., the grounds for appeal) recognized all of the instant crimes and is against the Defendant, that there was no record of punishment for committing the instant crime, such as the instant case, and that another accomplice’s proposal took part in the instant crime, and that the gains acquired by the Defendant from the instant crime are relatively large, may be considered favorably for the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant conspired with another accomplice to purchase an apartment under the name of another accomplice, and the defendant acquired the above apartment from the victims with the name of 113,90,000 won as a loan from the victims through the loan brokerage company, and the crime is not good in light of the method of crime and the degree of damage. The defendant directly entered into the above apartment contract with the previous owner in the course of the crime of this case and entered into a lease contract with the tenant. After making the moving-in report on the above apartment, the employee of the loan brokerage company stated that he is mixed with the above apartment, and provided another accomplice with the account to receive the loan. The defendant did not agree with the victim until the trial of the case. There is no circumstance that the defendant did not take measures to recover the damage, and there is no other circumstance that the defendant was sentenced to punishment several times due to violent crime, property crime, sex crime, obstruction of the performance of official duties, and arrest the defendant's age and condition of the crime of this case.