beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On November 9, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 by assault, etc. at the Seoul East Eastern District Court, and on January 4, 2013, the same court was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a result of the crime of interference with business. On July 8, 2013, the same court was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) and was sentenced to three years of suspended sentence on July 16, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on July 16, 2013,
【Criminal Facts】
1. Around 03:00 on July 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victims’ “Fnopolybs” in the “Fnopob,” operated by the victim D (W, 53 years of age), E (n, 55 years of age) in Songpa-gu Seoul; (b) expressed the victims “the victims of these years of opening; (c) 16,000 won (4,000 won per canter, per 4 years of age); and (d) received a delivery from the victims of drinking, of a large amount of 16,00 won (per 4,000 won per canter) at the market.
From September 25, 2014, the Defendant received alcoholic beverages amounting to KRW 128,00 in total at the market price by the same method seven times, as shown in the list of crimes (1) attached hereto, from that time until September 25, 2014.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually received property and acquired property benefits by demanding victims.
2. Around August 14, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, by force, obstructed the victim’s singing operations by avoiding disturbance, such as “the victim G (n, 55 years of age)” operated by Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and “Hnoode room”, and “the 112-report”, i.e., drinking, threatening the face, threatening the victim to report, thereby obstructing the victim from running singing businesses.
From that time to October 9, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victims’ singing practice three times, as shown in the list of offenses (2).
Accordingly, the defendant is forced to perform the work of victims.