Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud on September 12, 2013 at the Suwon Favour on September 12, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 24, 2013, and the criminal history of fraud reaches 11 times.

Defendant

B On September 29, 2006, the Seoul High Court was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a attempted crime by the Incheon District Court on April 6, 2007, and was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on July 5, 2007, and was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on May 22, 2008, and was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on May 20, 2010 and completed the enforcement of each of the above punishment on March 24, 2015, and was sentenced to 14 times of fraud.

Criminal facts

On September 6, 2015, the Defendants made a false statement to the victim G by “I wish to establish and operate a construction company, to lend money necessary for the establishment of the company.” The Defendants again purchased a vehicle under the name of the party with a loan from the capital company to purchase the vehicle from the loan from the loan company, and then borrowed money with the loan from the loan company to the loan company to the credit service provider. The principal and interest of the loan will change our country, and will return the vehicle from the credit service provider within one month to the party.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendants thought that they would engage in the so-called “work loan” work, which acquired the fees, etc. by forging evidentiary documents, etc. of their employment against those in need of urgency, and did not have the intent to operate the construction company, and therefore, they did not have any property or income.