logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.19 2020가단5188638
양수금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 51,54,920 and KRW 38,396,450 among them, from September 2, 2010 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

1. The judgment deemed a confession (Article 208(3)2, Article 150(3) main text, and the main text of Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act) on February 2, 200 (the creditor shall be deemed the plaintiff and the debtor shall be deemed the defendant) stating whether or not the facts recorded in the complaint are recognized in addition to the reply to the purport of the claim (Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure). However, even though the defendant submitted an objection against the payment order on June 29, 2020, he merely asserts that the defendant merely raised an objection against the payment order, but there is no specific reply as to the individual facts alleged by the plaintiff as the cause of the claim, and since the objection against the payment order was merely made between statements due to the lack of attendance at the date of pleadings, it shall be deemed that the defendant led to a confession of the plaintiff's assertion.

arrow