1. The defendant

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 26 million and its related thereto are 5% per annum from December 26, 2013 to February 6, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of the Korean War, military personnel belonging to the Defendant committed collective murder without following due process in front of the Haduk-si, Maduk-si, Maduk-si, Maduk-si, Maduk-si, Maduk-si, and Maduk-do.

(hereinafter referred to as "the case of sacrifice against civilians in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do"). (b)

1) The Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on Settlement of History") shall apply to the Act on Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation.

(2) The Committee on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter referred to as the “Committee on Settlement of History”) established by the Committee.

(2) As a result, on May 11, 2010, the former Review Committee received an application for ascertaining the truth of the case of a civilian sacrifice in Chungcheongbuk-do, and conducted an on-site investigation into the applicant’s investigation, reference witnesses investigation, data investigation, on-site investigation, etc.

8. 18.) At the Dacuk-si Sari, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongbuk-do, the civilian net G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

(2) The lower court determined that the Defendant’s investigation and determination was based on the findings of the fact-finding that the Defendant’s soldiers illegally sacrificed civilians, who were in an armed rioted state without legal procedure, and thereby infringed on the people’s right to life and the right to be tried in accordance with due process as guaranteed by the Constitution.

C. The status of the Plaintiffs is the deceased’s status, and the Plaintiff A, C, D, E, and F are children of the deceased. [The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, A1 through 11, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

2. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. In full view of the method of activities of the past company reorganization committee, the content of the investigation report, etc., the investigation report by the past company reorganization committee shall be deemed as valuable evidence in the civil lawsuit claiming damages against the State, barring any special circumstance.

, however, the case at issue.