Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the head of Pyeongtaek-si E, and Defendant B is the former head of F.
A person who intends to run a brokerage business shall register the establishment of a brokerage office with the head of Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over an area where he/she intends to establish a brokerage office.
Nevertheless, without the qualification of licensed real estate agents and the registration of establishment of a brokerage office, the Defendants played a leading role, such as mediating the purchase of land in the business area of Pyeongtaek-si in accordance with the plan to build H on December 201 in accordance with the third electricity supply and demand plan of the government with the aim of completing the construction of H in Pyeongtaek-si G with the aim of completing December 201.
Therefore, on May 16, 2008, at the K office operated by the JJ in Pyeongtaek-si I, the Defendants arranged a contract to sell L 4,867 square meters in amount to KRW 736,00,000,000 for L, and received KRW 29,40,000,000 per 3.3 square meters per m20,000 won per 3m20,000 in the name of brokerage commission from L, from the same day, from the time to January 5, 2009 by receiving brokerage commission of KRW 475,60,000,000 from the time to January 5, 2009, and run a real estate brokerage business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of the witness P, Q, J, R, S, T, U,V, L, W, and X;
1. Statement of police statement of S, J, R, P, Y, T, U, X, Q, Z, V, L, and AA;
1. Each real estate sales contract;
1. Statement of deposit transactions;
1. Application of the statutes of the detailed statement of transactions of free savings deposits;
1. Relevant Articles 48 and 9 (1) of the Act on Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions, and Selection of fines for the crime;
2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse.
3. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order.