Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant A and Defendant B, respectively, serve as the head of the team and the staff of 222 households from among the 345 households of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Apartment-gu D apartment.

On June 10, 2013, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) on the ground that they prevented the possession of the lien holders without any authority on No. 102,601, the D apartment 102, and 601, which were owned by the victim F, the Defendants were living until July 21, 2013.

As a result, the Defendants jointly intruded upon human habitation.

B. After intrusion into D Apartment No. 102, 601, the Defendants carried out 76,00,000 won or more at the market price, such as a 102-dong 102-dong 601, a table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table table.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

2. The evidence submitted by the public prosecutor alone that the Defendants had intentionally infringed upon their residence at the time.

It is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendants stolen the victim’s property, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. As the instant facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, each of the Defendants is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.