beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On February 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on February 17, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the one-year prison for the North Korean defectors.
【Criminal Facts】 2016 Highest 579】
1. On March 9, 2016, around 00:30 on March 9, 2016, the Defendant ordered the “EM” of the victim D’s operation in Jung-gu Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant issued an order with 10 Maju-ju as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price of alcoholic beverages and would normally pay the price.
The Defendant deceptioned the victim as such, and received property worth KRW 200,000 in total from the victim.
2. On March 30, 2016, around 2016, around 23:00, the Defendant ordered “H” of the Victim G management in Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, Daegu, that the Defendant would normally pay the food cost, and that the Defendant would normally pay the price even though there is no intent or ability to pay it.
The Defendant deceptioned the victim as such, and received property worth KRW 20,000 in total from the victim’s market value.
3. On March 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 04:38 on March 31, 2016, around 04:38, and around 1, 2016, the Defendant: (b) on the part of the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (c) as if the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee, he would normally pay the taxi fee; (d) on the part of the victim J driver’s taxi, she was boarding
The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the market value of 5,200 won from the victim.
"2016 Highest 752"
1. On March 9, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime on March 12:10, 2016, on the street in front of the Dogdong-dong in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, notwithstanding the absence of an intention or ability to pay a taxi fee, the Defendant was in the zone where the Defendant was in the north-gu Dogdong, the destination of which was at least 13:20 on the same day, by boarding a new taxi operated by the victim M as he/she would normally pay the taxi fee.