logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.08 2017고정191
약사법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operates a business of electronic commerce transaction (mail order filing number: D) called "C" at his/her own residence.

No person shall put a mark on a container, package, or appended document for non-pharmaceutical drugs or non-pharmaceutical drugs, which is likely to mislead people to believe that they have efficacy, efficacy, effect, etc., or advertise such contents, and shall sell such drugs or non-pharmaceutical drugs, store, display them for sale.

Nevertheless, from early July 2016 to early October 2010 of the same year, the Defendant posted a page on the Electronic Commerce Enterprise website (htp: / an / an malblm2.co.m.co.m.), which does not belong to a pharmaceutical product or an pharmaceutical product, for the purpose of selling “Simmon natural scamscamscams”. The Defendant posted a page for the purpose of the advertisement in question, “for the eradication of shock,” “natural camscamscams”, “biological products”, “camscamsic scamscamscam or small scamscamscamscams.

Using the phrase, “,” etc., advertised that the product is likely to be mistaken for non-pharmaceutical drugs.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third public trial date);

1. A person in charge of accusation;

1. Application of statutes on the screen of the Internet advertisement closure and business registration certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Article 93 (1) 10, Article 66, and Article 61 (2) (Selection of Penalty) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the Defendant appears to have entirely failed to sell products entered in the crime; and (c) the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment several times due to similar crimes (an advertisement with contents likely to mislead the Defendant as functional health foods and an advertisement with medical efficacy and efficacy).

arrow