logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.06.11 2015구합134
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on August 4, 2013 with a short-term visit (C-3, expiration date of the period of stay: September 3, 2013), and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on September 3, 2013.

B. On February 10, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 25, 2014, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the said objection on December 16, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2 and Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is Slimlima. The plaintiff is a Islamic person.

On March 3, 2013, in the area of the Pakistan Abbbbba, there occurred a large number of Islamic believerss who died. Party members belonging to the Islamic Party of the Islamic Party of the Islamic Party of the Asia (hereinafter referred to as "Simpha Party") were suspected of committing the bomba.

Accordingly, on March 5, 2013, the members of the Simpa political party threatened the Plaintiff, who is extremely engaged in the Islamic activity, with “Ispathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic.” On the following day, the Plaintiff

In addition, on July 6, 2013, the members of the Sispath political party were able to shoot the plaintiff's house and run away.

Therefore, when the plaintiff returns to Pakistan, it shall be from the members of the Pacific Party on the ground of the above religion.

arrow