1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff regarding the Plaintiff’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant with respect to D Oral Ba (hereinafter “Defendant Oral Ba”).

On February 5, 2016, the driver E of the Plaintiff’s vehicle that occurred in the instant accident was in transit by the Daejeon Immigration Office in the front of the G pharmacy located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “instant intersection”) from the border distance to the face of the Daejeon Immigration Office.

Although the instant intersection did not have a signal apparatus on the road in the running direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, at the intersection, traffic is controlled by the signal apparatus installed on the intersection and the intersection was controlled by the signal apparatus. However, the Plaintiff’s driver confirmed that the vehicle signal, etc. on the running direction of the intersection is changed to the red light, and there was a traffic accident in which the part of the front direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the front direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle are shocked, while disregarding the signal while straighted.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident.” The Plaintiff paid KRW 249,990 to the Plaintiff’s insurance money for the damage of the Plaintiff’s vehicle based on the terms and conditions of self-vehicle damage security.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion of the following facts: Gap's evidence 1 to Gap's evidence 8 and the plaintiff's assertion of the whole purport of pleading is caused by the whole negligence of the defendant Oral Ba driver who entered the intersection in violation of the signal.

Therefore, the defendant should pay the amount equivalent to the money paid by the plaintiff to the plaintiff to the plaintiff to the plaintiff who acquired the right of indemnity in accordance with the automobile insurance clause and the insurer subrogation under Article 682 of the

An intersection where traffic is controlled by the judgment-related legal signals, etc. concerning the cause of the claim shall be followed by the ongoing signal.