Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 26, 2014, around 14:50 on August 26, 2014, the Defendant of obstruction of performance of official duties at the site of dispatch: (a) committed assault before Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu, the police officer interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning handling of the 112 reported case by assaulting D and slope E, who was called out by the Defendant, to be subject to notification as a violation of punishment (instigious disturbance) from the position D and slope E belonging to the Seoul Songpa Police Station C District; (b) spits off the face of D; and (c) spits down the face of D; and (d) sat down his head at one time.

2. Performance of official duties and injury at the patrol vehicle were arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reasons as above, and assaulted, such as spiting, spiting (57 years old) the face of the victim D (57 years old) who was seated next to the police patrol, spiting, drinking the head by drinking, wheeling the rank with the face of the left knife with the knife, opening the rank with the face of the driver, booming the victim E (39 years old) who was seated on the driver's seat, booming the upper right side of the victim E (39 years old) who was seated on the driver's seat, and quihing the driver's seat with the knife with the knife.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police offender, and at the same time, the victim D needs to be treated for about two weeks, and the victim E are on the right side tag that needs to be treated for about one week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each of violence-related photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not to be weak, but to the effect that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, and that it is before the crime of this case.