1. Defendant B’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by Defendant B.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff filed a claim against Defendant B and Defendant C for damages with the primary Defendant and Defendant C as the primary Defendant. The first instance court rejected the claim against Defendant B, and dismissed the claim against Defendant D and the primary Defendant C.

Since only Defendant B appealed against this, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the claim against the primary Defendant B and the claim against the primary Defendant C (the part against Defendant D in the first instance court was finalized by the failure of the Plaintiff to appeal). 2. The grounds alleged in the first instance court by Defendant B, who filed an appeal by the court of first instance, are not significantly different from the contents as alleged in the first instance court, and even if all of the evidence presented in the first instance and the first instance court are examined, the judgment of the first instance court is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for this court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the “No. 12-1 through No. 3” of No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “No. 2-1 through No. 3”; and (b) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment on Defendant C’s power of representation is added as follows; and (c) thus, it is acceptable as

3. The part added by Defendant B asserts that the power of representation has not been granted to Defendant C. Thus, according to the overall purport of the entries and arguments as follows: Dop, Nos. 1, 5, 8, and 9 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Nos. 7, 8, 10, and Nos. 1 and 2, and Nos. 7, 8, 10, and Nos. 1 and 2, the sales contract of the apartment of this case prepared as of November 26, 2012 is accompanied by the Defendant B’s seal impression affixed to the sales contract of the apartment of this case as of November 26, 201 and a copy of the identification card attached to the Defendant B. ② The above seal impression and identification card directly submitted to Defendant C for the sale of the apartment of this case, and ③ Defendant B filed a complaint with the Plaintiff and Defendant C as the forgery of private documents and the display of