Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is the captain of a coastal mixed-sea fishing vessel C (6.34 tons) with the responsibility for the operation of the above fishing vessel and the safety management of the crew.
At around 06:00 on April 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the said fishing vessel in Cukdong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Seoyang-gu; (b) entered the said fishing vessel into the port, wherein D and E and E and 25 years of age, crew members; and (c) sailed from the 16th of the same month, from around 09:00 to around 000 of the same month; (b) sailed from the 0.3math of the north-dong bank, through the speed of 6 knots at the same time, the Defendant directed the victim and D to cover approximately 500 of the gate 500 on the deck through the vessel shock prevention plate on the port.
In the event of navigation in the course of operating a literacy complex, there is a risk of falling on the sea because the reduction of a literacy complex on the bridge or the gals of the seafarers working at the work is sloping or sufficient, a person responsible for safety management has a duty of care to provide sufficient safety education to the seafarers working at the work, to allow at least two persons to work together in the course of the project, or to rescue in the event of an accident at all times in the course of the work in the case of a mixed work.
However, at the time, a seafarer D, who had been engaged in the operation of a network in a player, moved to a restaurant located in the stern to boom a boom with the victim, and was engaged in the operation of the victim mixed with the victim. As such, the defendant should have observed the victim in the process of mixed work until the victim completes the work safely, or where it is difficult, the victim should be suspended from the work safely. However, the defendant did not seem to have any particular day, and did not observe the victim's work properly.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.