The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The determination of the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment: imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and two months, and penalty surcharges) is unreasonable;

2. The sentence sentenced by the court below is within the recommended range of punishment according to the attached sentencing guidelines (from August to September).

In consideration of the defendant's reflectivity, punishment was imposed in consideration of the same criminal power, the period of repeated crime, etc.

The court below did not err in selecting and applying sentencing factors, and there is no change in sentencing factors in the appellate court.

Even if this court re-examines the sentencing factors and other factors of sentencing which are set forth in the sentencing criteria, the determination of the original sentence is inappropriate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

The dismissal under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.