The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), and H is the representative director of the victim I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”) established for the purpose of oil sale, and J is the representative director of K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”).

K L from G around January 29, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”).

After concluding a contract to receive a contract, around February 5, 2013, upon entering into an agreement with I for the supply of oil from February 19, 2013 to March 8, 2013, the oil equivalent to KRW 22,165,406 was supplied from February 19, 2013, but the construction was suspended as of March 8, 2013 and the said construction was completed. From March 9, 2013, G was supplied with oil from I while performing the construction directly.

A. On October 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) lost in the first instance court the claim for oil payment that “I would pay KRW 96,194,077, which I provided from February 19, 2013 to May 31, 2013; (b) the Defendant filed against G; (c) the Defendant, at the N Attorney-at-law office located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul, to be exempted from the payment of the said fuel payment, submitted to J at the construction site on November 5, 2014, the Defendant filed a false complaint against G to the effect that “K would be responsible for the payment of the oil supplied by G” in the process, “I would be exempt from the payment of the said fuel payment,” which was submitted by the court of first instance on March 8, 2013 at the N Attorney-at-law office of Ulsan-gu, Seoul, to the effect that I would be exempt from the payment of the fuel payment at the construction site.”

5. The testimony is true, and since the mid-term and long-term and there is no fact that G is responsible for the oil price, and since the date of completion on March 8, 2013 at the site of K K Co., Ltd. is around May 8, 2013, the object of payment of oil price to K is not a stock company but a stock company.