Text
1. The Defendant: 44,295,651 won to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); 35,165,635 won to the Appointed B; 22,095,316 won to the Appointed C;
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties concerned (appointed parties; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties B, C, and D (hereinafter referred to as the “designated parties”) are workers who worked in the Dong Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Dong Housing”) and the Defendant is a company with the purpose of guaranteeing the sale of housing and guaranteeing the repair of defects in housing constructed and supplied by a project proprietor pursuant to Article 77 of the Housing Act.
B. The Plaintiff and the designated parties of each claim for the Plaintiff’s 2nd and 2nd and 2nd and 3th and 2nd and 2nd and 3th and 2nd and 5th and 2nd and 3th and 5th and 20th and 3th and 20th and 5th and 3th and 5th and 20th and 5th and 5th and 20th and 20th and 3th and 5th and 5th and 5th and 5th and 20th and 3th and 5th and 5th and 20th and 5th and 20th and 3th and 5th and 20th and 5th of the total amount of the principal and 43th and 5th of the 20th and 5th of the 2nd and 3th of the 2nd and 5th of the 2nd and 3th of the 2nd and 5th of the 2013th and 25th of the 2013th annual interest.
C. A claim against the Defendant of the Dae-dong Housing, etc. 1) The Defendant, on August 17, 2006, shall construct Dae-dong Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Dae-dong Comprehensive Construction”) as the trial contractor of the Jin-dong Forest Apartment located in the sports team (hereinafter “Mo-dong Integrated Construction”).
The above apartment company is the executory company.