Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 8, 2012, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath at the Seoul High Court court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the collection amount case (Plaintiff: F, Defendant G, and H) at the above court (Seoul High Court).

The Defendant testified to the presiding judge of the 16th Civil Department of the above court in the trial of the above case without including “(the witness)” (whether the above I includes the content that the above I would incur loss to the company by payment in lieu of the price significantly lower than 2401 at the time of filing a complaint against I for the crime of occupational breach of trust).

However, in fact, the defendant filed a complaint against I that I would incur damage to the company by payment in lieu of the above 2401 units, including the above 2401 units, and the above I was prosecuted for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation) on December 12, 2008.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Seoul High Court 2011Na57687 Protocol of Examination of Witness (No. 2);

1. Statement of examination of witness in Seoul Central District Court 2008Gau4172 (No. 14,20);

1. Seoul Central District Court 2008 High Court Decision 1406 (No. 15)

1. Certificate of the result of the disposition of the case (No. 16);

1. Statement of examination of witness as Seoul Central District Court 2008 High Court 1406 High Court (No. 19);

1. A copy of the complaint filed by the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office 2007 type No. 11965 type No. 41 type

1. A copy of the statement (No. 42) of the Act and subordinate statutes apply to the defendant;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant alleged to the effect that “the Defendant was not guilty because 2401 did not enter in the accusation,” or “the Defendant stated as such because 2401 was not innocent or detained.” However, according to the records, I and the Defendant, as the Defendant’s proposal, have one head of 2401 and 2405 (the investigation record 108, 209 pages), and the Defendant and I purchased shares 2401 and 2401.