Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 24, 2017, at around 01:25, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s property by continuously destroying approximately KRW 600,000,00 of the repair cost, such as moving a part of the driver’s seat of the Do white sports car, the victim C, who is parked in the area without any justifiable reason, by walking the part of the driver’s seat of the car, which is owned by the Defendant, on the upper part of the above sentence, and continuously destroying the knife of FHJ10T-7 OE, which is owned by the victim E, by putting the knife onto the floor and destroying the knife part above the floor, and thereby damaging the knife amount of KRW 200,000,00,000,000,000,000.

2. On December 24, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the above place, and at around 01:40 on December 24, 2017, the Defendant arrested the police officer assigned to the police officer assigned to the branch of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station G police station in the Southern Branch, who called the scene after receiving a report that the Defendant would damage the car under the influence of alcohol, etc., as a current offender, and assaulted twice the police officer assigned to the said police officer, who was in charge of the Defendant’s personal injury at the lower seat of the patrol unit No. 14, on two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Photographs, etc. of damaged articles;

1. On-site CCTV extraction photographs;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by victim C phone), investigation report (to hear statements by victim E phone), and investigation report (to listen to statements by victim) [limited to the case of a police officer in the process of driving his body under the influence of alcohol at the time, and there was no fact that a police officer twice as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment, and there was no criminal intent to obstruct the performance of official duties;

The argument is asserted.

However, the defendant is under investigation by an investigative agency about the obstruction of the performance of official duties, and the defendant does not memory the drunkly.

On the other hand, police officers I made a statement in detail at the time of crime in an investigative agency, and the above statement is considered to be false.