(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.25 2014고정1101

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.25 2014고정1101

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in taxi driving for B rocketing other business purposes.

On March 7, 2014, the Defendant driving the said taxi as of March 7, 2013:20, and proceeding about 40-50 kilometers in speed from the direction of the mountain middle school ginseng distance to the side of the Busan Daegu Agricultural Cooperative located in Mountain-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-do, in the direction of the mountain comprehensive market.

The direction of the third party was made bypassing to the original direction.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, to accurately operate the steering and brakes, and to verify the safety of course and to make a right-hand.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the D Poter Cargo Sheet, which was parked by the victim C (year 52) at the point of accident due to the negligence of bypassing it as it is, and then conflicts with the right side and rear part, etc. before the left side of the said taxi.

On the front side of the Triwon, the speed of the Si is about 20-30 kilometers along the fire-fighting road in the direction of life-fighting.

The FST3 vehicle that was driven by the victim E(61) on the left-hand side of the proceeding direction conflicts with the part on the left-hand side of the vehicle that was driven by the victim E(61) and the part on the upper-hand side of the vehicle that was parked on the right-hand side of the vehicle that was parked by the victim G(51) who was parked on the right-hand side of the proceeding direction, and conflict with the part on the rear-hand side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, did not take any necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and checking the damage if the repair cost is damaged to cover KRW 2,329,968, 968, 202, such as repair cost, 447,734, 6,530, 630, 630, 630, 200, 329, 968, 308, 202, such as the replacement of the cargo loaded in the said D Poter, replacement of the following Poter, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement with respect to E and I.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.10.19 2017고정42

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.09.20 2016고단531

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.07.03 2014고단917

-서울서부지방법원 2013.06.20 2013고단676

-대구지방법원 2012.09.12 2011고정3631