A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the loan claim case between the Plaintiff C and the Defendant D in the Daegu District Court of the Republic of Korea on February 13, 2013, 2013, which was the court of the said court of the Republic of Korea, and subsequently, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant borrowed five million won to the Plaintiff.

“I have borrowed money” to the Plaintiff’s question.

The plaintiff's answer, "I talk about the overall cost of producing a signboard or construction," and "I talk about what purpose it should be used to the witness before the loan?"

“In response, D was known to C around September 1, 2012 that it borrowed five million won from D and D around September 11, 2012, and D would use the said borrowed money as signboard expenses and construction cost.

The testimony was made to the effect that there was a lusent figure.

However, in fact, the defendant's living female D had not borrowed five million won from C around September 1, 2012, and the defendant received five million won from C as deposit in the name of D. The defendant did not have any talk about D about the above loan and the use of borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Investigative into past transaction details attached to a written statement made by the prosecution against D;

1. Report on investigation (report on the commencement of internal investigation) - One copy of the protocol of examination of witness;

1. Investigation report (the filing of court records No. 2013 A. 2013 A. 15283 in the Daegu District Court), - The Daegu District Court No. 2013 A. 15283 in the Daegu District Court Decision No. 2013 (U.S.), asserts that the Defendant is not the Defendant, but D, and the Defendant was aware of his talking from D.

However, according to the above evidence, the defendant and D promise to marry on April 2012 and live together with the defendant on the promise of marriage on July 2012, 2012, and the defendant organized "F" of coffee specialty operated by the defendant around July 2012.