Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

From July 7, 2006 to July 5, 2007, the Defendant resided in the 40-1 Gaba-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Songpa-gu, 100-1 Gaba-dong, and was engaged in a sobrying intermediary, but did not have certain occupation and income, and operated the shower execution letter in the 1998 Gaba-si, 1998.

The parties did not have the ability to repay money to others even if they borrowed money from others due to the circumstance that they have repaid money by the above time.

Nevertheless, on September 5, 2006, the defendant lent 200,000 won to the victim C at a non-permanent place on September 5, 2006.

‘Falsely speaking, the victim received KRW 200,000 from the victim, i.e., one bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the defendant, from the victim, from July 5, 2007, and received KRW 32,040,000,00 in total from the victim by the same method as the list of crimes, from July 5, 2007.

Accordingly, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each investigation report (in addition to cases, related to investigation of E, additional investigation of witnesses E, accompanying materials submitted by complainants, summary information of case, and attachment of court rulings);

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a cash storage certificate, a fact confirmation certificate, a statement of deposit to a defendant Gap, a letter of personal presentation by the complainant C, and the details of remittance of amount from damage;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, inclusive, with regard to applicable Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects a criminal act, while there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant before the prosecution, while the defendant has been punished eight times for the same crime.