A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who actually operates the “C” of a company performing air-conditioning and cooling works.

On March 15, 2013, the Defendant entered into a heating and cooling contract with the victim E (41) on a contract amount of KRW 101,200,00, and the construction period of KRW 100 on March 15, 2013, as a result, on April 30, 2013, the Defendant agreed to receive KRW 22,00,000,000 from the completion of the contract to receive KRW 70% of the progress of the construction before carrying out the equipment after the completion of the pipeline, and KRW 55,00,000,000 after the completion of the installation, within 30 days after the completion of the installation. After obtaining confirmation from the supervising company on the progress of the construction, the Defendant agreed to receive money in accordance with the aforementioned fair rate.

At that time, the Defendant forged an on-site supervision report on the progress of the progress of the financing crisis, such as receiving a demand notice on repayment due to the obligation for the construction cost, etc., which was not paid separately from the contract of the victim, thereby deceiving the victim, and receiving the construction cost in advance from the victim and using it for the repayment

1. The act of forging and uttering private documents;

A. On March 2013, 2013, the Defendant confirmed that, on March 21, 2013, the term “on-site report on supervision”, “1. Won-do Construction Do Do Do Do : D additional construction : 2. Site address”, “3. Subcontract Do Do : D additional construction : heating and cooling system construction work during D additional construction,” “4. 4. : heating and cooling system construction work process report”, and “the content of this air-conditioning system construction: 25% progress.”

The “F” column and the “Person installing Supervision” were written as “F,” and the C HT stamp was affixed next thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a field supervision report under F, a private document related to the certification of facts, and at the same time exercised one copy of a false field supervision report to E, who is unaware of the fact of the foregoing Article.

B. On April 19, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime on April 19, 2013: “on-site supervision report” in the white paper on April 19, 2013; and “1. original level construction: D.