beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 20, 2016, the Defendant, at around 20:0, 200, she was aware of the victim E (47 years, women) who visited due to the pains of the pelvis, the pelvis, and spine in the second floor of the Gyeyang-gu building C, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, by means of “satise depth.”
The Defendant, who is a massage, has a duty to prevent in advance any injury, such as blood transfusion and charnel, by taking into account the physical characteristics of a person who will be aware of in advance by taking a body by taking pressure, and the part of the person who will be aware of in advance, which is a method of massage, and by taking into account the body characteristics and the part of the person who will be aware of in advance.
However, while the Defendant was negligent in doing so by taking the boness of the victim's vertebral with the verte at the center of spine, the Defendant suffered from the victim's injury of the cage of cages, fryp, fryp, and chests that require four weeks' medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Witness E;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect partially against the defendant;
1. Statement made by the police in relation to E (including substitute part);
1. Arrangement of letters, etc. by accident day;
1. Medical certificate [The defendant denies the fact that he was injured, but the victim has made a concrete and consistent statement about the background and contents of the injury from the police to this court, and thus, its credibility is recognized; the defendant has a enemy who followed the victim's et al. at the time of the instant case by the police (the 61th page of the investigation record) and the victim's right shoulder is left after the eth day has expired.
in addition, it was found to have been in place.
On June 21, 2016, the following day, the defendant sent F a text message stating that the defendant, after completing an investigation (46 pages of the investigation record), he returned to the house, he sent F a letter message to F that the defendant would have any pain to leave the house by taking out the route, etc., and the victim's continued appeal on June 21, 2016, and the defendant open the house of the victim.