A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2014, the Defendant borrowed the check number D, face value D, 3,00,000,000, and the family check on April 20, 2014, issued by B B from B, and used money to borrow money from C around December 10, 2014.

On December 11, 2014, the Defendant modified the date of issuance indicated as the “Fast on April 20, 2014” of the foregoing household check by using the Yast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Mast-Sa

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against B and C;

1. Nullification judgment;

1. To describe a copy of household check and to apply the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 214(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime (the alteration of securities by pay) and Articles 217 and 214(1) of the Criminal Act (the exercise of securities by mistake) of the same Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, such as the alteration of securities, need to be strictly punished as being detrimental to the general public’s trust in the safety and credit of the securities transaction. The defendant borrowed money from C and delivered the revised family identification card to C, and there is no benefit acquired by the defendant as a result of the crime in this case, and the defendant’s benefit was significant. The defendant reflects the crime late, and other favorable circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the various factors indicated in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc.