1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants shall be revoked.

2. The Plaintiff, Defendant D, and Defendant D, Defendant D, KRW 37,500,00.

According to the evidence Nos. 3 through 6 of the court of first instance, the authenticity of each of the above documents is recognized. Defendant D claims that his signature was forged under the evidence Nos. 5 and 6 of the court of first instance, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it), Defendant D is manufacturing car and Defendant E has guaranteed his/her obligation as a her her vegetator in the summary settlement of issues. Upon examining the evidence of Defendant B, the Plaintiff lent a total of KRW 32 million to C on March 2, 2011 at the interest rate of 24% per annum, and Defendant E lent a total of KRW 32 million to Defendant C on March 30, 201, and the Plaintiff jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligation, the Plaintiff lent KRW 13 million to C on March 30, 2012 at the interest rate of KRW 24 million per annum 24 million to Defendant D and 25 million to Defendant D and 24 million to each of the above loan obligation.

Therefore, Defendant D is jointly and severally with Defendant C, and Defendant E is jointly and severally liable to pay interest at the rate of 24% per annum with respect to each of the above amounts of KRW 32,00,000 and each of the above amounts of KRW 32,00,000,000, which the Plaintiff sought from October 1, 2014 to the date of full payment. Thus, all of the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants are reasonable and acceptable. Since the part against the Defendants in the judgment of the first instance court that differs from this conclusion is unfair, it is revoked by accepting the Plaintiff’s appeal and ordering the Defendants to pay the above amounts, and it is so decided as per Disposition.